nanog mailing list archives

Backward Compatibility Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block


From: "Abraham Y. Chen" <aychen () avinta com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 17:35:12 -0500

Hi, Randy:

1)    " ... dual-stack mess ... it was intended. it was the original transition plan. ":

    Perhaps you are too young to realize that the original IPv6 plan was not designed to be backward compatible to IPv4, and Dual-Stack was developed (through some iterations) to bridge the transition between IPv4 and IPv6? You may want to spend a few moments to read some history on this.


Regards,


Abe (2024-01-12 17:34)




On 2024-01-12 00:11, Randy Bush wrote:
We don't need to extend IPv4, we need to figure out why we are in this
dual-stack mess, which was never intended, and how to get out of it.
it was intended.  it was the original transition plan.  like many things
about ipv6, it could have been a bit better thought out.

randy



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

Current thread: