nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mailing list SPF Failure
From: "Scott Q." <qmail () top-consulting net>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 11:59:05 -0400
Uhm, not really. An SPF failure is really bad even though DKIM works. It might depend what they do with DMARC but even so, there's no reason they can't just add that IP to their SPF record.
From what I see, it's been broken at least since May 6-7.
On Thursday, 16/05/2024 at 11:37 Michael Thomas wrote: On 5/16/24 8:11 AM, Peter Potvin via NANOG wrote: Appears there’s no SPF record at all now for nanog.org [1], which is not ideal… Since probably 99% of the mail from NANOG is through this list, it hardly matters since SPF will always fail. What is more important is that they resign with DKIM so that receivers can use that identity. SPF is for the most part belt and suspenders. Mike Kind regards, Peter Potvin On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:59 Bjørn Mork wrote: "Scott Q." writes:
Anyone else getting SPF failures on all messages sent to the list ? I see them all originating from 50.31.151.76 but nanog.org [1]'s
SPF
record doesn't list that as allowed.
I see the same. nanog.org [1] mail is originated from 2001:1838:2001:8:0:0:0:20 or 50.31.151.76, and the SPF record is currently "v=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com [2] ~all" Neither of those are Google addresses so it's a soft fail. Bjørn Links: ------ [1] http://nanog.org [2] http://spf.google.com
Current thread:
- Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Mel Beckman (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Bjørn Mork (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Peter Potvin via NANOG (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure William Herrin (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Peter Potvin via NANOG (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)