Nmap Announce mailing list archives
RE: legality of port-mapping
From: "Chris St. Clair" <chris_stclair () hotmail com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 13:03:41 PST
The fact, however, is that you are contacting services which you >don't
have authorization for. You *are* connecting to those >services, and you will cause the CPU in question to consume cycles >dealing with you and possibly even fork(). Under "normal" "bug-free" >circumstances this does not cause any harm, *however* you are using a >resource on that machine. I think that legally the argument could >very easily be made that you are *using* resources that you have no >rights to. So, given the previous statement on unauthorized use of resources (cpu cycles), a ping of a system would be just as illegal as a port scan? Is anyone arresting Cheswick? GTFOH. You can't know that "Unauthorized access to this system is restricted" until after you open a connection and get the banner. If you stick a box on a public network (never forget it's a public network), with ports available to anyone (no ACLs), you might as well be operating a store on Main St. USA with your front door propped open. Sure, you can reserve the right to refuse anyone service, but it's not illegal for them to walk in. Now, if you want to lock your door, only give certain people that key, and install an alarm system that's great. You actually have some security now (no, it's not free sorry if you can't afford it). ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Current thread:
- RE: legality of port-mapping Chris St. Clair (Mar 01)
- Re: legality of port-mapping Rob Quinn (Mar 01)
- Re: legality of port-mapping Gregory A. Carter (Mar 03)
- Re: legality of port-mapping Lamont Granquist (Mar 04)
- Re: legality of port-mapping Gregory A. Carter (Mar 03)
- Re: legality of port-mapping Rob Quinn (Mar 01)