Nmap Announce mailing list archives
Re: distributed nmap?
From: Arturo Busleiman <buanzox () usa net>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 23:33:39 -0300 (ART)
hi! Why not adding a --agent x.x.x.x [port] parameter? It would turn nmap into an agent, and the 'boss' client would be running at x.x.x.x (port [port] if specified) It would be easier, the boss client would be nmap --boss n it then would sit there waiting till 'n' agents connect, then allowing to enter scan options/targets, send them to each agent (of course, it would distribute the port range among them!!). what do you think of this? *> Panic? My kernel doesn't panic! We are doomed! DustDustDust!!!! *> Get PGP KEY: use pgpk -a hkp://horowitz.surfnet.nl/buanzox () usa net *> System Fork BBS, en Argentina! (5411) 4799-2510 Dedaparamaxxaginos rules!
Current thread:
- distributed nmap? Lorell Hathcock (Mar 18)
- Re: distributed nmap? Thomas Reinke (Mar 18)
- Re: distributed nmap? Arturo Busleiman (Mar 18)
- Re: distributed nmap? Lance Spitzner (Mar 19)
- Re: distributed nmap? Frasnelli, Dan (Mar 19)
- Re: distributed nmap? Aaron D. Turner (Mar 19)
- Re: distributed nmap? D . R . Tzeck (Mar 21)
- Re: distributed nmap? Arturo Busleiman (Mar 18)
- Re: distributed nmap? Thomas Reinke (Mar 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: distributed nmap? Aaron D. Turner (Mar 19)
- Re: distributed nmap? Simple Nomad (Mar 24)