Nmap Development mailing list archives
nmap 3.75 vs 3.55
From: micro dev <microdev1 () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:22:55 -0800 (PST)
Hi, nmap 3.75 shows problems for a subnet where nmap 3.55 works fine. Here's initial output when scanned by 3.75 version and it never seemed to end.... nmap.exe -sS --max_rtt_timeout 300 --min_parallelism 50 -T 3 -O -p 7,21,23,25,53,80,110,135,139,445,514,1066,1977 -v 10.25.5.1-100 Starting nmap 3.75 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap ) at 2005-01-21 09:34 Pacific Standard Time adjust_timeout: packet supposedly had rtt of 64188000 microseconds. Ignoring time. adjust_timeout: packet supposedly had rtt of 64188000 microseconds. Ignoring time. adjust_timeout: packet supposedly had rtt of 64188000 microseconds. Ignoring time. adjust_timeout: packet supposedly had rtt of 30000000 microseconds. Ignoring time. adjust_timeout: packet supposedly had rtt of 30015000 microseconds. Ignoring time. adjust_timeout: packet supposedly had rtt of 69000000 microseconds. Ignoring time. adjust_timeout: packet supposedly had rtt of 69000000 microseconds. Ignoring time. adjust_timeout: packet supposedly had rtt of 27000000 microseconds. Ignoring time. adjust_timeout: packet supposedly had rtt of 27000000 microseconds. Ignoring time. When scanned by 3.55 version, it works fine. Infact it took just 20 seconds to scan 100 IP addresses. Here's initial ouput - nmap.exe -sS --max_rtt_timeout 300 --min_parallelism 50 -T 3 -O -p 7,21,23,25,53,80,110,135,139,445,514,1066,1977 -v 10.25.5.1-100 Starting nmap 3.55 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap ) at 2005-01-21 09:58 Pacific Standard Time Host 10.25.5.1 appears to be up ... good. Initiating SYN Stealth Scan against 10.25.5.1 at 09:58 Adding open port 139/tcp Adding open port 135/tcp Adding open port 53/tcp Adding open port 445/tcp The SYN Stealth Scan took 0 seconds to scan 13 ports. For OSScan assuming that port 53 is open and port 7 is closed and neither are firewalled Interesting ports on 10.25.5.1: PORT STATE SERVICE 7/tcp closed echo 21/tcp closed ftp 23/tcp closed telnet 25/tcp closed smtp 53/tcp open domain 80/tcp closed http 110/tcp closed pop3 135/tcp open msrpc 139/tcp open netbios-ssn 445/tcp open microsoft-ds 514/tcp closed shell 1066/tcp closed unknown 1977/tcp closed unknown Device type: general purpose Running: Microsoft Windows 2003/.NET|NT/2K/XP OS details: Microsoft Windows Server 2003 or XP SP2 TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=truly random Difficulty=9999999 (Good luck!) IPID Sequence Generation: Incremental nmap 3.75 seems to be faster than 3.55 where it works but I have noticed that it fails in quite a few subnets. Any ideas, why this happens ? Thanks --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
Current thread:
- nmap 3.75 vs 3.55 micro dev (Jan 21)