Re: Why is ncacn_http commented out?

[Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>]

On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:26:23PM +0100, Martin Ma?ok wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 09:25:17PM -0800, Fyodor wrote:
>
> I have came across ncacn_http for several times but always with the
> same responses as the commented out one. It seems to me that without
> specialized probe we won't get more from it (just a guess).

A specialized ncacn_http probe could be very useful.  I'm hoping that
someone (possibly me) will eventually look into these ncacn_http and
determine whether custom probes would be a practical way to
differentiate them.  If they find that custom probes won't help and
all we can do is determine that a service is ncacn_http, then I'll
certainly uncomment the signature.

Cheers,
Fyodor

---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org