Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Socat
From: Max <Reply.to.list () acme com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:37:46 +0200
Yep, but there's no Windows version :-( A Windows version of this sort of tool is *mandatory* since it is often used as a backdoor/tunnel on a vulnerable machine. And what OS is more vulnerable than any other ? Hence this mandatory requirement :-) M@x Martin Mačok wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:36:32AM -0700, Fyodor wrote:Netcat has been totally unmaintained for about a decade, and I think Nmap users would benefit from a tool similar to hping2 that is more oriented toward their needs.I'm still happy with hping2 (ok, lets forget about the patches we had to apply to it ;-) *except* its poor ICMP support (sing is better here). Anyway, your proposal for Netcat enhancement almost exactly fits Socat. Have you heard of it? Wonderful tool (and GPL) ... http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/ Martin Mačok ICT Security Consultant
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping?, (continued)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Andreia Gaita (Jun 15)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Leon (Jun 15)
- Message not available
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Leon (Jun 15)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Simon Spencer (Jun 16)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Andreia Gaita (Jun 16)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Simon Spencer (Jun 16)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Fyodor (Jun 15)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Chuck (Jun 15)