Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released
From: "Andy Lutomirski" <luto () stanford edu>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 16:23:09 -0800
On 3/4/06, AgentSmith15 <agentsmith15 () gmail com> wrote:
Can someone explain this survey question? "Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) features: Refuse to function without license key, require registration and EULA acceptance to download." What would be the pro/cons to this?
Surely the point would be to make nmap integrate with the TCPA features in modern machines to ensure that all outgoing packets have the correct security flags (see RFC 3514), ending once and for all the threat of misconfigured firewalls inadvertantly allowing portscanning. As a pleasant side effect, it would make it so that any music you share, legally or otherwise, using nmap can only be played on approved hardware. --Andy _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released Fyodor (Mar 03)
- Re: Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released AgentSmith15 (Mar 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released David Warde-Farley (Mar 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released Jamie Gavahan (Mar 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released David Warde-Farley (Mar 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released David Warde-Farley (Mar 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released Andy Lutomirski (Mar 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released Fyodor (Mar 05)
- Re: Nmap 4.02Alpha1 Released AgentSmith15 (Mar 04)