Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format
From: "Livio Zanol Puppim" <livio.zanol.puppim () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:29:40 -0300
Yeah, I know It's against RFC, but a lot of things are against it either... Like "every host should reply an echo request with an echo reply" and many many other things... Some companys likes to use this kind of mask to "masquerade" their networks... I've never tried the method you've menthioned, i'll give this a try... Thanks, Lívio Zanol Puppim 2006/10/19, Martin Mačok <martin.macok () underground cz>:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:02:05PM -0200, Livio Zanol Puppim wrote:I'm asking this cause I have already seen crazies subnet masks used (like 255.0.255.255).This is against RFC, anyway. Netmask should be continuous and expressible in /X notation where X is (0,32).So with that kind of subnet masks I can't make a complete subnet scan with the normal format...Have you tried scanning A.0-255.C.D ? Martin Mačok ICT Security Consultant _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 18)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Martin Mačok (Oct 18)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format William McVey (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Martin Mačok (Oct 18)