Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 01:04:57 -0700
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:36:05PM +0200, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
I am caching the compiled PCRE regexps into the NSE registry using a fairly straightfoward scheme:Great! - I'll make sure to update the docs on pcre
Hi Stoiko. Updating docs is wonderful, particularly with all the changes NSE has been going through. But I'm not 100% sold on the idea of caching compiled regular expressions in the NSE registry as a general rule. Before we recommend that, I'd love to see some empirical data that it makes a material performance difference.
Perhaps it would be useful to look for an init function which is called only once per script per nmap invocation and only right before action() is called? Another solution we should consider is passing a table to the action function that scripts can use for cross-invocation persistent dataActually variables defined (either as local or not) outside of functions in a nse-script keep their value during multiple invocations of the script. So if you define an empty table right before the action function and fill it during the first run of the action, the data saved in it will be still there during the next invocation(s).
That is great to know! Is this in the docs? Maybe this would be a better way to store variables such as compiled PCREs.
IMPORTANT NOTE FOR NSE SCRIPT WRITERS: Don't use the function receive_lines() unless you plan on doing your own line parsing. This function WILL RETURN MORE THAN JUST THE FIRST LINE OF DATA IF MORE IS AVAILABLE.I'll take a look at it - maybe there is an easy way to replace receive_lines with your buffer-approach, which seems more flexible anyway.
That could be. It might even be best to add the feature to nsock itself. Or maybe you'll find it more convenient/performant to add it at another layer. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature Stoiko Ivanov (Jul 02)
- Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature Diman Todorov (Jul 03)
- Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature Fyodor (Jul 04)
- Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature majek04 (Jul 04)
- Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature Fyodor (Jul 04)
- Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature Diman Todorov (Jul 04)
- Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature majek04 (Jul 04)
- Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature doug (Jul 04)