Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Is QSCAN forgotten?
From: Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <buanzo () buanzo com ar>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:21:18 -0300
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 doug () hcsw org wrote:
Thanks for asking about Qscan! No, it hasn't been forgotten, just sidetracked. I plan on writing a nuff script called qscan
Damn, and Qscan was one of the two (the other being NSE) most exciting features I demosntrated in my last nmap talks :P - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica ¿Su empresa consume demasiado ancho de banda? ¡Consulteme! Free (as in Freedom) Punk Rock from Argentina: http://www.futurabanda.com.ar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGlaw7AlpOsGhXcE0RClOAAJ972TI0O7OpOzvHs/i7Puk4AP5MFACdGP5Q rGVTRPn1tgc7jnvxs4zaeKY= =eWWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Is QSCAN forgotten? majek04 (Jul 11)
- Re: Is QSCAN forgotten? doug (Jul 11)
- Re: Is QSCAN forgotten? Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Jul 11)
- Re: Is QSCAN forgotten? doug (Jul 11)