Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50?
From: doug () hcsw org
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:57:21 -0800
Hi Lionel, Thanks for the bug report. I was just about to reply with more or less what Fyodor recommends here: On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:46:33PM -0800 or thereabouts, Fyodor wrote:
Thanks for the report Lionel. Can you run it with "--packet-trace -d5" and see what happens? After it runs for 20 minutes or so, kill it with ^C. Then would you grab the last 500 lines or so and send them to the list? That should help us understand where it is looping.
Also, can you reproduce this with a single IP? If so, the output from a dig command might also be helpful: dig +trace -x a.b.c.d Best, Doug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Lionel Cons (Dec 19)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Fyodor (Dec 20)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? doug (Dec 20)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Lionel Cons (Dec 21)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Lionel Cons (Dec 21)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? doug (Dec 21)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? doug (Dec 20)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Fyodor (Dec 20)