Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: osmatch vs osclass
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:15:28 -0700
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:27:39PM -0400, Rick wrote:
Hi, Sorry if I'm bringing up the the obviously covered, if so please kindly point me to where I can get more details. I'm trying to parse the xml output and make a determination based on the accuracy to finally pick just one type of os ( windows, linux..) to represent what was found. I understand that this isn't guaranteed. What's confusing me is osmatch versus the osclass and which to use to base that decision.
If you are just trying to get the type of OS (e.g. Windows, Linux), you should use the osclass. If you want a free-form description which potentially includes extra little details and more specificity, use the osmatch. You can read about the two here: http://nmap.org/osdetect/osdetect-fingerprint-format.html#osdetect-ref-format (The "Fingerprint" section describes osmatch, the "Class" section describes osclass) Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- osmatch vs osclass Rick (Mar 14)
- Re: osmatch vs osclass Fyodor (Mar 14)
- [no subject] swapna prasad (Mar 16)
- ftp on windows swapna prasad (Mar 17)
- Re: ftp on windows doug (Mar 18)
- [no subject] swapna prasad (Mar 16)
- Re: osmatch vs osclass Fyodor (Mar 14)