Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts
From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 00:10:37 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 jah wrote:
On 14/05/2008 17:06, Kris Katterjohn wrote:I've committed the patch for this and added to Default. Aside from SMTPcommands being changed (which can wait and be moved over later), are there any other outstanding issues with the current list below? What about dns-test-open-recusion as Jah mentioned?I did a little test and from 5000 hosts, 7 had udp 53 open and of those, 3 resulted in "Recursion seems enabled". So, er, that's conclusive then. Of course, this means I got 4997 "Recursion not enabled" which gives a very poor signal to noise ratio! Perhaps it would be best to leave this one out.
Unless there is any objection, I'm going to remove the "Recursion not enabled" from the script because it does add unnecessary clutter to the output (even completely aside from the Default-worthiness of it). 3/7 isn't bad, so I think it is still OK for Default with the above removed. What do you guys think?
jah
Thanks, Kris Katterjohn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBSCvFyP9K37xXYl36AQJqAw/8Cywby15zAgRZwq9jvV05ptUFKPfo1hgb Zu6oV7wFv8wWnSqHF8/LncJ75gzC9G0f8OmsKdBRMi3lGMuHPqNH1/jeVRl4qGUb 0BVUn3k5lHjnE8W59BRHnt8xjV5yI4UycQmKcWHOOd3jERaEbCliNF+ROVtALdug jyHbb6ev8YibjUxQnonx0jPrfPcAGYBEjrx54khbrHDMtKPeNqidomJvMtb+ODFt IlR8wVXRKZEsVLxq5MjHveS2UHdrJJuuYDG+iB0UBVX9xxYHc5VpIt/u1r1A6sG4 mFFWnAlYZ3JqaCj2LtC77SliTp81CHkhVeikZkxG7x8eWoQx5ZDdPUWmXlm7/2Lo YiIcIgZO8FKT+aT7qcG21jT/nPoscOO5gRtJc5cyKpaCQ/qznTGzYQC0aSTbu5Xn t3XlctV0p59/mP/6bVV+VNBFObxnr+nngKxF7hUJCISMOjzLuuN5081xwrR0xg8z Cg9OhKk+aOdtKKwjKcvuy9CVvjuA058DmD8xPLWmepzCJdR1ho6os1Wmrr/ofpcf Y7pnooPDr2BFCHhVFztZVAYckKb3wPsQOM++ZUYQHYnNt9Ql4Kf0fOaq3h8xutIL YhfLtbcYp6i0Lvjm841VHb0NRX75NcHU48sLz9PRCS596YqT9Uzb/Zg6LYxCuSmq 9vD+hsFt75I= =exVR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Daniel Roethlisberger (May 12)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (May 12)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Fyodor (May 12)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Fyodor (May 12)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Diman Todorov (May 11)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Fyodor (May 12)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Kris Katterjohn (May 12)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Kris Katterjohn (May 12)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Kris Katterjohn (May 14)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts jah (May 14)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Kris Katterjohn (May 14)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Brandon Enright (May 14)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Kris Katterjohn (May 14)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Kris Katterjohn (May 12)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Kris Katterjohn (May 16)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Fyodor (May 16)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Kris Katterjohn (May 16)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts DePriest, Jason R. (May 19)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Fyodor (May 19)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts DePriest, Jason R. (May 19)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (May 20)
- Re: [RFC] Default NSE Scripts DePriest, Jason R. (May 21)