Nmap Development mailing list archives
RE: ambiguity about nmap results
From: "Thomas Tavaris J (Tavaris)" <tjthomas () LGSInnovations com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:55:54 -0400
FYI....... Whois Record for www.nmapyourself.com Registrant: April Kochanowski 6009 Ranlyn Ave. Cincinnati, Ohio 45239 United States Domain Name: NMAPYOURSELF.COM Created on: 06-Dec-06 Expires on: 06-Dec-08 Last Updated on: 11-Dec-07 Administrative Contact: Kochanowski, April 6009 Ranlyn Ave. Cincinnati, Ohio 45239 United States (513) 741-2902 Technical Contact: Kochanowski, April 6009 Ranlyn Ave. Cincinnati, Ohio 45239 United States (513) 741-2902 Domain servers in listed order: NS19.DOMAINCONTROL.COM NS20.DOMAINCONTROL.COM -----Original Message----- From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of sara fink Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 2:48 PM To: Nmap Dev Subject: ambiguity about nmap results I tried to use nmap from this web site: http://www.nwwmapyourself.com/. If I try to run nmap on my external ip say at range 1-1024 with flag -sT I get Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2008-05-30 14:42 EDT Interesting ports on some ip .: Not shown: 1022 closed ports PORT STATE SERVICE 0/tcp filtered unknown 139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn 445/tcp filtered microsoft-ds To check myself again, I connected via ssh to some other site and from there ran nmap -sT -p 1-1024 ip
From there I got a completely different result. Almost all the 1025
ports are open except very few. Someone can explain me why I get such a difference? _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- RE: ambiguity about nmap results Thomas Tavaris J (Tavaris) (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Mike pattrick (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results DePriest, Jason R. (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- RE: ambiguity about nmap results Rob Nicholls (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Mike pattrick (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Brandon Enright (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)