Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please)
From: jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:57:32 +0100
On 03/06/2008 09:33, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
2) Each thread for a script has it's own action closure and environment
Hi Patrick, Quick question. Does 2) above mean that with the changes in your branch, the only way to share variable values between threads of the same script is using nmap.registry and not by declaring the variables outside of action() (as is currently possible)? This is certainly the behaviour I observe in your branch and I'm just checking that this is expected. Cheers, jah _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Kris Katterjohn (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) David Fifield (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Kris Katterjohn (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 03)
- RE: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Thomas Buchanan (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 07)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) jah (Jun 08)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 08)