Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: radialnet


From: "sara fink" <sara.fink () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:32:51 +0300

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Richard Sammet <
richard.sammet () googlemail com> wrote:





and for your second question: how long did you wait? is the
destination network firewalled? maybe you should try to apply a more
aggressive timing option like -T5?

it could be the case that it just take that long because of a lot of
retransmissions (dropping firewall).


There are firewalls there. Will try the -T5 as you suggest.  I waited 20-30
min.




greetings,
richard


On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:27 PM, sara fink <sara.fink () gmail com> wrote:
I am scanning a large network  xxx.xxx.0-255.0-255. This should scan
65536
hosts. Why does it show

Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 4096 hosts. at 16:02
Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 4096 hosts. at 16:03, 36.63s elapsed
Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 16:03
Scanning 64 hosts [1000 ports/host]

My second question is that the scan appears to be stuck at 0.99%. Zenmap
is
not build to search such a large range?
I need it for topology visualization of the net with radialnet.

The command I run is nmap  --traceroute -v -sS -sV -T4 -PN
xxx.xxx.0-255.0-255 .

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org




--
The major quality problem of open mailing lists is that everybody can
take part. (/me)

ATTENTION!
PLEASE ENCRYPT MESSAGES AND ATTACHMENTS IF THEY CONTAIN PRIVATE
INFORMATION!


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org


Current thread: