Re: Upgraded shipped libdnet to 1.12

[Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Fifield wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:17:56AM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote:
> > I've upgraded the libdnet shipped with Nmap (libdnet-stripped) to v1.12.
> >
> > I've tested it on Windows XP and Linux and it works great.  Fyodor has tested
> > it on 2 Linux boxes with success.
>
> It works fine for me on GNU/Linux and Windows XP.

Great!

> > WRT some of the changes for Windows[1], it has been kept much like vanilla
> > 1.12.  eth_open() isn't modified (since it's been changed upstream), and
> > eth_get_pcap_devname() has been cut down to match against just hardware
> > addresses instead of IPs first.  I've tested scanning under Windows with no
> > problem, and using --iflist with vanilla Nmap 4.76 and an Nmap with the new
> > libdnet yield the exact same results.
>
> That's great. It seemed to be the right approach to me so I'm glad it
> works.

I am too.  And thanks for your previous posts on the Windows changes, they
were quite insightful.

> David Fifield

Thanks,
Kris Katterjohn

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=mjtQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org