Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!]
From: Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:27:36 -0500
David Fifield wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Sven Klemm wrote:
>
That's interesting that OpenSSL ignores the parity bits. I don't know exactly what scripts will need, but it seems that at least a function to convert a 56-bit byte string to a 64-bit key with correct parity would be required. Is that what you needed for your script, Ron? David Fifield
Well, I'm not 100% sure what I need right now, I'm no expert on OpenSSL. I'm going to try making room for the parity bits by hand (well, in C), and checking if I get the expected result. If that works, then that's all I need.
Ron _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 04)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 05)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Sven Klemm (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] David Fifield (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Sven Klemm (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] David Fifield (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Sven Klemm (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 07)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Sven Klemm (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 05)