Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: ncat udp
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:24:36 -0600
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 01:07:21PM -0600, David Fifield wrote:
Measuring idleness with --exec would be difficult, because we currently give up control of the socket when we hand it to the child process. I can see a solution where we fork off a "caretaker" process that shuttles data to and from the child process (like we do in a thread under Windows) and can measure for idleness. This is rather cumbersome, but it would also enable --exec to work with --ssl, which it doesn't currently.
This would also allow the logging options (--output and --hex-dump) to work with --exec and --sh-exec. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- ncat udp Marius Sturm (Mar 25)
- Re: ncat udp David Fifield (Mar 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ncat udp Marius Sturm (Mar 26)
- Re: ncat udp David Fifield (Mar 26)
- Re: ncat udp Marius Sturm (Mar 27)
- Re: ncat udp David Fifield (Mar 27)
- Re: ncat udp David Fifield (Mar 27)
- Re: ncat udp David Fifield (Mar 26)