Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker)
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:45:23 -0700
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:11:14AM -0500, Ron wrote:
Ron wrote: Ok, I managed to throw this together before work. If you're below verbosity 2, you'll just get:
Thanks Ron, this helps. I also just made further output changes in r13522: o If an infection is found, print the whole table regardless of verbosity so the user can see which tests/ports showed an infection. o Print nothing for clean machines unless running with -vv. That way folks who run it as part of the default script set don't have to read about every machine which is NOT infected. So many "false alarms" could cause them to miss noticing the infection reports. o I updated the examples in the nsedoc to include -vv, since those are specifically designed for Conficker scanning. Let me know if you see any problems with these changes. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Fyodor (Jun 03)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Kris Katterjohn (Jun 03)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 03)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Fyodor (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Fyodor (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 04)