Re: Am I Missing Something?

[Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>]

mike wrote:
> also, this is just an idea so feel free to shoot it down if need be. instead of typing out constantly eack script we 
> want to run like "-script="insert long SMB script name here"", could we not just use a simple numbering scheme to 
> call, like "-script=5" and it runs script #5 in the scripts folder?. just have them numbered 1-whatever. to me, it 
> just seems far easier to work with. you could still have output from a debug/script trace that showed you what script 
> you were firing off as well
Having them numbered seems awfully arbitrary to me, and will result in
you running the wrong scripts after every update. I don't think that's a
great idea.

A couple ideas, though:
- Have bash autocomplete for script names (not sure how that works, but
I've heard it's possible)
- Use wildcards -- smb*users or *shares* or something.

Just my opinion.

Ron


-- 
Ron Bowes
http://www.skullsecurity.org/
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/