Re: Requests for script dependencies

[David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>]

On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 02:24:53PM -0700, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:55 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
> > Patrick, please make a branch for this patch. I want it to be merged,
> > but it should be done all at once with the addition of dependency tables
> > to the scripts themselves.
>
> For the record, this is now completed and can be inspected at:
>
> svn://svn.insecure.org/nmap-exp/patrick/dependencies@16345

Thanks, it looks great and please commit it.

Here are the dependencies that are defined:

smb-check-vulns: smb-brute, smb-enum-sessions, smb-security-mode,
        smb-check-vulns, smb-enum-shares, smb-server-stats,
        smb-enum-domains, smb-enum-users, smb-system-info,
        smb-enum-groups, smb-os-discovery, smb-enum-processes,
        smb-psexe

smb-enum-domains: smb-brute
smb-enum-groups: smb-brute
smb-enum-processes: smb-brute
smb-enum-sessions: smb-brute
smb-enum-shares: smb-brute
smb-enum-users: smb-brute
smb-os-discovery: smb-brute
smb-psexec: smb-brute
smb-security-mode: smb-brute
smb-server-stats: smb-brute
smb-system-info: smb-brute

snmp-sysdescr: snmp-brute

Before we had these runlevel definitions different from 1.0:

0.5: smb-brute
2.0: smb-check-vulns snmp-sysdescr p2p-conficker

The dependencies capture all of that except for p2p-conficker. I can't
remember why p2p-conficker is in runlevel 2 to begin with; does anyone
know? It's in "default" and "safe" so it can't be because of a risk of
crashing. Probably we can just leave it out of the dependencies.

David Fifield
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/