Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [patch] Match for QIL gateway
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:31:32 -0700
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:54:21PM -0500, Matt Selsky wrote:
On Dec 31, 2009, at 9:40 PM, David Fifield wrote:On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 07:06:10PM -0500, Matt Selsky wrote:Attached patch adds a matchline for the Columbia University QIL Gateway (QI to LDAP ). See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2378 for more information on QI aka CSO.Thanks Matt, added. I changed the service name from "cso" to "ccso", and "QI" to "Qi" to match some web resources. Are those changes accurate?For Qi, yes. Regarding cso vs ccso, the RFC says ccso, but IANA says cso (http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers) I'm not sure who is authoritative.
I changed it to cso to match IANA. In the master nmap-services-all file, port 105 is csnet-ns 105/tcp 0/79710 # Mailbox Name Nameserver csnet-ns 105/udp 29/60699 # Mailbox Name Nameserver Which may be the same thing, I'm not sure. It has a low probability of being open so it's not in the smaller nmap-services we ship. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: [patch] Match for QIL gateway Matt Selsky (Jan 02)
- Re: [patch] Match for QIL gateway David Fifield (Jan 02)
- Re: [patch] Match for QIL gateway Matt Selsky (Jan 02)
- Re: [patch] Match for QIL gateway David Fifield (Jan 02)