Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Better compression for the Windows installer
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:04:03 -0700
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:37:36PM -0600, David Fifield wrote:
How does this sound? At the end of this message is the output of makensis.exe using the different options.
It sounds wonderful! Thanks for testing. As you know from our investigation today, the Nmap Windows executables are the biggest bandwidth hogs on the site. I like the idea of enabling this on the Pcap installer too if it helps. LZMA is probably most famous for its use in the 7-Zip 7z format. Maybe sometime we'll distribute Nmap in 7z format too. I just installed p7zip (http://sourceforge.net/projects/p7zip/) and here are the sizes for the Nmap 5.30BETA1 package: 41082880 nmap-5.30BETA1.tar 12965256 nmap-5.30BETA1.tgz 11273966 nmap-5.30BETA1.tar.bz2 10005965 nmap-5.30BETA1.tar.7z That is greater than an 11% reduction in the bz2 size for the 7z. It almost even beat the 10MB mark! Too bad my "tar" can't deal with it. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Better compression for the Windows installer David Fifield (Jun 29)
- Re: Better compression for the Windows installer Fyodor (Jun 29)
- Re: Better compression for the Windows installer Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Jun 30)
- Re: Better compression for the Windows installer David Fifield (Jun 30)
- Re: Better compression for the Windows installer David Fifield (Jun 30)
- Re: Better compression for the Windows installer Memphis Bytes (Jun 30)
- Re: Better compression for the Windows installer Fyodor (Jun 29)