Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse
From: doug () hcsw org
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:37:27 +0000
Hi Brandon, On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 01:26:58AM +0000 or thereabouts, Brandon Enright wrote:
Doug, I'm interested in your thoughts. Feel free to tell me why I'm being stupid :-)
I think you make some really good points. Qscan could probably be parallelized without impacting the results. Like you say, with enough data the statistics could be simplified. I suspect there is a point where congestion would start affecting the results but as long as it affects all packets equally that might not even be a problem. I'd like to experiment more with this some day but don't have the time right now. Good luck, Doug
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse Ron (Apr 08)
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse Brandon Enright (Apr 08)
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse Kris Katterjohn (Apr 08)
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse Ron (Apr 08)
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse Brandon Enright (Apr 08)
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse Brandon Enright (Apr 08)
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse Brandon Enright (Apr 14)
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse Kris Katterjohn (Apr 15)
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse David Fifield (Apr 21)
- Re: Qscan in NSE: qscan.nse doug (Apr 15)