Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: NSE [GSoC] Infrastructure Tasks
From: Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:40:16 -0400
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:47 AM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:56:55PM -0400, Patrick Donnelly wrote:On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com> wrote:I'll add more as I think of stuff.Tentative idea: o Add an LPeg parser for IDL [1]. The parser would dynamically generate a new parser (also LPeg) that allows a script to talk via the interface (in one specific case, MS RPC calls).I know you're keen to get LPeg in NSE. In order to ease its acceptance, could its first use be something less complex than an LPeg meta-generator? An esoteric use is going to turn people off. There has to be a simpler solution.
This is indeed a complicated use of LPeg. I wouldn't try to use it as a way to get LPeg accepted. I'm just writing this idea down so it isn't forgotten. -- - Patrick Donnelly _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: NSE [GSoC] Infrastructure Tasks Patrick Donnelly (Apr 18)
- Re: NSE [GSoC] Infrastructure Tasks David Fifield (Apr 18)
- Re: NSE [GSoC] Infrastructure Tasks Patrick Donnelly (Apr 24)
- Re: NSE: IDL parser David Fifield (May 12)
- Re: NSE: IDL parser Dražen Popović (May 12)
- Re: NSE: IDL parser Ron (May 13)
- Re: NSE: IDL parser Fyodor (May 13)
- Re: NSE: IDL parser Patrick Donnelly (May 14)
- Re: NSE: IDL parser Dražen Popović (May 12)
- Re: NSE [GSoC] Infrastructure Tasks David Fifield (Apr 18)