Re: bug in svn 17300

[jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>]

On 06/05/2010 22:38, David Fifield wrote:
> Thanks, that confirms my suspicion. Changing the probe was probably
> enough to avoid triggering whatever IDS rule was causing the bogus ICMP
> response to be sent. Anyway, I've added EPROTO to the list of known
> error code (that won't cause Nmap to abort) in r17488.
>   
I'm getting a compiler error because of EPROTO:

..\service_scan.cc(2271) : error C2065: 'EPROTO' : undeclared identifier


I can't find a windows equivalent for EPROTO and from a quick google,
there doesn't seem to be one defined for BSD variants either (for
example [1] and [2]) so perhaps the EPROTO case in service_scan should
be wrapped in an ifdef directive as in the attached patch.

Sound OK?

jah

Attachment: service_scan.c.patch
Description:

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/