Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:59:32 -0700
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:37:55PM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote:
On 2010-10-16 15:24:21 -0700, Fyodor wrote: For the extra texts: "NSE: Script Pre-scanning.", "NSE: Script scanning 127.0.0.1" "NSE: Script Post-scanning." These messages can be removed easily: we do not print them if all script rules evaluate to false (no threads). A simple patch is attached to remove the two "Pre-scanning" and "Post-scanning" messages.
Thanks Djalal. BTW, I don't think I'm opposed to the messages like this with -v when there are real scripts running. My concern was that scripts were running uneccessarily (e.g. the ones which had their conditionals in the action rather than the prerule statement), and a side effect of that problem was the pointless (in those cases) verbosity. Cheers, Fyodor _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Tom Sellers (Oct 16)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Fyodor (Oct 16)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Patrik Karlsson (Oct 16)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns David Fifield (Oct 18)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Patrik Karlsson (Oct 18)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Djalal Harouni (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Djalal Harouni (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Fyodor (Oct 16)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Djalal Harouni (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Fyodor (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Djalal Harouni (Oct 31)