Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Weird Crash - "WAITING_TO_RUNNING"


From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:59:20 -0800

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:42:45PM -0800, David Fifield wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 05:37:54PM -0700, Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:11 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
If you consistently get different results over, say, three runs, then
I'll look at it closer.

Sure thing.  It looks pretty consistent to me.  Here's three runs on
the same server with 5.35DC1 with your custom nse_main.lua:

Scan ending at Mon Nov 22 16:45:14 MST 2010:
5m12s - 53392KB RAM

Scan ending at Mon Nov 22 16:51:06 MST 2010:
5m8s - 54836KB RAM

Scan ending at Mon Nov 22 16:58:16 MST 2010
5m26s - 55980KB RAM

(Note that I didn't run these end-on-end, I typed some stuff into this
email in between each scan)

And if you're still available, can you do one more with 5.36TEST2?

David Fifield

5.36TEST2 with CONCURRENCY_LIMIT lowered to 100:
Scan ending at Mon Nov 22 17:29:20 MST 2010
13m26 - 69644KB RAM

I've got to run -- I'm late leaving work, but I can rerun it without
the altered CONCURRENCY_LIMIT tomorrow (I forgot I had that alteration
in there).

That's fine; I think this is conclusive enough.

I looked over the code and I can't find what might be causing the change
in run time. I attached four different versions of nse_main.lua that
make incremental changes. Please try running each of the four and report
the times you get. Just copy each one over nse_main.lua in turn.

David Fifield

Attachment: nse_main.lua.1
Description:

Attachment: nse_main.lua.2
Description:

Attachment: nse_main.lua.3
Description:

Attachment: nse_main.lua.4
Description:

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/

Current thread: