Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:53:53 -0500
Ron,According to https://code.google.com/p/armitage/source/browse/trunk/scripts/hosts.sl, a "Comprehensive" scan is "-sS -sU -T5 -A -v -PE -PP -PS80,443 -PA3389 -PU40125 -PY -g 53 --script all"
Given that smb-flood is part of "all", it's no wonder this times out. Dan On 06/16/2011 04:35 PM, Ron wrote:
Hey, I've never used Armitage before, and I don't know what a 'comprehensive scan' consists of. Can you provide the commandline that Nmap is run with when doing that scan? It seems like the host-timeout argument or something similar might be too low. Ron On Sun, 15 May 2011 00:39:24 -0400 furikuri () hush com wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello there, Here is some background: - -BackTrack5 linux with gnome 2.6 - -Nmap version 5.51 - -metasploit v3.7.1-release [core:3.7 api:1.0] at revision 12616 Now onto the problem: *keep in mind this is via Armitage* When i run any nmap scan other than comprehensive, everything seems to work. The targets appear and some info in regards to them does as well. On the other hand when i try to run comprehensive nmap, everything appears to be fine until somewhere into 50% of service scan, upon which the target apparently times out (this is all within my home network and no matter what target yields the same results with the comprehensive scan ). Here is what i get: [*] Nmap: Service scan Timing: About 46.67% done; ETC: 21:04 (0:11:58 remaining) [*] Nmap: Completed Service scan at 20:52, 657.85s elapsed (1 host timed out) [*] Nmap: NSE: Script scanning 192.168.1.105. [*] Nmap: Initiating NSE at 20:52 [*] Nmap: Completed NSE at 20:52, 4.50s elapsed [*] Nmap: NSE: Script scanning 192.168.1.105. [*] Nmap: Initiating NSE at 20:52 [*] Nmap: Completed NSE at 20:52, 0.11s elapsed [*] Nmap: Nmap scan report for 192.168.1.105 [*] Nmap: Host is up (0.0016s latency). [*] Nmap: Skipping host 192.168.1.105 due to host timeout [*] Nmap: Read data files from: /opt/framework3/share/nmap [*] Nmap: OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org/submit/ . [*] Nmap: Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 978.96 seconds [*] Nmap: Raw packets sent: 3575 (119.079KB) | Rcvd: 1252 (54.174KB) [-] Error while running command db_nmap: undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass Call stack: /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/rex/parser/nmap_xml.rb:109:in `tag_start' /opt/framework3/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/parsers/streamparser.rb:24 :in `parse' /opt/framework3/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/document.rb:204:in `parse_stream' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/msf/core/db.rb:3961:in `import_nmap_xml' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/msf/core/db.rb:3823:in `import_nmap_xml_file' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/msf/ui/console/command_dispatcher/db.rb:157 4:in `cmd_db_nmap' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/rex/ui/text/dispatcher_shell.rb:331:in `run_command' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/rex/ui/text/dispatcher_shell.rb:293:in `block in run_single' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/rex/ui/text/dispatcher_shell.rb:287:in `each' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/rex/ui/text/dispatcher_shell.rb:287:in `run_single' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/rex/ui/text/shell.rb:143:in `run' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/msf/ui/web/console.rb:65:in `block in initialize' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/msf/core/thread_manager.rb:64:in `call' /opt/framework3/msf3/lib/msf/core/thread_manager.rb:64:in `block in spawn' At first i though that i was at fault but after looking around i found another person with the same problem. That person was told that it was a bug and after posting my question on a board, i was told the same thing. So hopefully this will get your attention. If possible please respond and confirm whether it indeed is a bug! Thank-you! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Charset: UTF8 Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 3.0 wsBcBAEBAgAGBQJNz1j8AAoJEOwvtPx290AsnFYH/1s+54dpyuCHLO0QMnwO92cpRhYo owhfH5FTLV6bGYxmndy22pxfPBbaT2kFcIqJoUK54GNIWLsuYEUaxMwPGQQe6QIuPba3 31uHrc3reV/WBWLiwA1agVuE45PVsX4D/Ogmv6oPANsXLblNe8L9mMbNPBoXRPraxS3r mnu7cqzj06lIY8bB6ggTA4shXi759pafLyjIByKyaNDR3w4/OLxMVuXokKbpHtswmGS9 kaJWNsosaWJudUmYpsJzpLqMVoSLYPaXeLLXuXUhLy57M8emunLbKi3QCONbMFYO+W9p XqLWMDJz+4c7KvrTfdYT/AAORkXDtEBY69uZqSZgGHs= =b81v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage furikuri (May 14)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Ron (Jun 16)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Daniel Miller (Jun 16)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Ron (Jun 16)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Shinnok (Jun 17)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage David Fifield (Jun 17)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Shinnok (Jun 17)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Fyodor (Jun 19)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage David Fifield (Jun 20)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Shinnok (Jun 21)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Fyodor (Jun 22)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Shinnok (Jun 23)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Shinnok (Jun 23)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Daniel Miller (Jun 16)
- Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage Ron (Jun 16)