Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: New VA Modules: OpenVAS: 26, MSF: 1, Nessus: 638
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:48:56 -0700
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:10:50PM -0400, Renaud Deraison wrote:
Adding/changing IP addresses should not affect the "DRM" system. I'd be happy to discuss the details with whoever is in charge of that system to understand what happened and fix the issue on our side if that's where the issue lies.
Hi Renaud, thanks for the response. We also did a "yum update" to get the latest system (CentOS 5.6 x86_64) updates. Then we rebooted with the new IPv6 address (IPv4 address didn't change) and Nessus suddenly started refusing to update because: "Could not validate this nessus-fetch.rc file - has it been copied from another system?" It may be the same problem experienced by this CentOS Nessus user: https://discussions.nessus.org/message/7816#7816 In that case you suggested that he reregister the scanner feed from scratch and get a new key. That's what we did too, and it seems to be working again now. Cheers, Fyodor _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- New VA Modules: OpenVAS: 26, MSF: 1, Nessus: 638 New VA Module Alert Service (May 17)
- Re: New VA Modules: OpenVAS: 26, MSF: 1, Nessus: 638 Fyodor (May 18)
- Re: New VA Modules: OpenVAS: 26, MSF: 1, Nessus: 638 Renaud Deraison (May 18)
- Re: New VA Modules: OpenVAS: 26, MSF: 1, Nessus: 638 Fyodor (May 18)
- Re: New VA Modules: OpenVAS: 26, MSF: 1, Nessus: 638 Renaud Deraison (May 18)
- Re: New VA Modules: OpenVAS: 26, MSF: 1, Nessus: 638 Fyodor (May 18)