Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Java RMI service finderprint?
From: Gabriel Lawrence <gabriel.lawrence () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:32:30 -0700
I suppose i should go read the source... But, I'll ask here. --version-all (Try every single probe) . An alias for --version-intensity 9, ensuring that every single probe is attempted against each port. So, does it stop as soon as one match is found or does it continue? what order does it pick? i think the solution i was suggesting was that it only go and try all the ones it wouldnt have normally tried when all the normal ones fail... If thats the way -version-all works, that's cool and would totally meet my needs. gabe On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:14 AM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>wrote:
Maybe this is an opportunity to add a flag to ignore ports and try all service fingerprints against a listener that didn't fingerprint in the original pass?That's what --version-all does. David Fifield
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint?, (continued)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Martin Holst Swende (Jun 15)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? David Fifield (Jun 15)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Martin Holst Swende (Jun 15)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Martin Holst Swende (Jun 16)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Martin Holst Swende (Jun 14)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Gabriel Lawrence (Jun 14)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Martin Holst Swende (Jun 14)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Gabriel Lawrence (Jun 14)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? David Fifield (Jun 15)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Gabriel Lawrence (Jun 15)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? David Fifield (Jun 15)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Martin Holst Swende (Jun 15)