Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] Improving performance for ssl-enum-ciphers
From: Patrik Karlsson <patrik () cqure net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 21:44:44 +0200
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:29 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:22:55PM -0400, Matt Selsky wrote:On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Patrik Karlsson wrote:I've experimented a little with ssl-enum-ciphers lately and justchangedthe script to use worker threads instead of sequentially running allthecipher checks. As far as my quick tests show I'm seeing consistent results with the non-threaded version but at 10 times the speed. I'm attaching a patch for this change for anyone that would like totestthis new version and would appreciate some feedback.I've used this patch to scan a Solaris server running Apache and thescan went from 40s to 20s with the same results. Let's apply it then. David Fifield
Committed as r28653. Thanks. //Patrik -- Patrik Karlsson http://www.cqure.net http://twitter.com/nevdull77 _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- [NSE] Improving performance for ssl-enum-ciphers Patrik Karlsson (May 22)
- Re: [NSE] Improving performance for ssl-enum-ciphers Matt Selsky (May 22)
- Re: [NSE] Improving performance for ssl-enum-ciphers David Fifield (May 22)
- Re: [NSE] Improving performance for ssl-enum-ciphers Patrik Karlsson (May 22)
- Re: [NSE] Improving performance for ssl-enum-ciphers David Fifield (May 22)
- Re: [NSE] Improving performance for ssl-enum-ciphers Matt Selsky (May 22)