Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Finding v6 hosts by efficiently mapping ip6.arpa


From: Patrik Karlsson <patrik () cqure net>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 07:02:10 +0200

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:01 AM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:

On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:06:48PM +0200, Patrik Karlsson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Thierry Zoller <Thierry () zoller lu>
wrote:


This should be of interest to the group


http://7bits.nl/blog/2012/03/26/finding-v6-hosts-by-efficiently-mapping-ip6-arpa

--
http://blog.zoller.lu
Thierry Zoller


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Thanks Thierry!

I just committed an Nmap script called dns-ip6-arpa-scan.nse, that
implements the technique.
It uses multiple threads to do the lookup and I was amazed by the result.

This is really awesome, and thanks for doign it so quickly. However I
couldn't get it to run properly when trying to map the addresses around
nmap.org; I always got an error.

NSE: 'dns-ip6-arpa-scan' (thread: 0x175de40) threw an error!
/home/david/nmap-git/scripts/dns-ip6-arpa-scan.nse:70: attempt to
concatenate local 'f' (a table value)
stack traceback:
       /home/david/nmap-git/scripts/dns-ip6-arpa-scan.nse:70: in function
</home/david/nmap-git/scripts/dns-ip6-arpa-scan.nse:52>
       (tail call): ?

I made these changes and now it seems to work.

David Fifield


Thanks David!

I actually scanned the same segment with a 48 mask yesterday and it worked
great.
Tried you command and it failed. I was having doubts using the same table
for results and pending in the first place.
I've applied your patch in r28379.

Cheers,
Patrik
-- 
Patrik Karlsson
http://www.cqure.net
http://twitter.com/nevdull77
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: