Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time.
From: James Rogers <jamesmrogers () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:33:52 -0400
I see this sequence number issue as different than the spurious port closed bug, that I why I broke it up in a different email. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:58:28PM -0400, James Rogers wrote:Thanks for the other comment location and the revision log number. I will read that. I'll try get_random_u32() there to see what effect that has.get_random_u32 in the seq field won't do anything to solve this bug. I suggest you save that for later. That's only if we decide that sending seq=0 all the time for ACK probes is the wrong thing to do. You're better off doing experiments with tcp_probe_match. David Fifield
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time. James Rogers (Jun 13)
- Re: ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time. David Fifield (Jun 13)
- Re: ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time. David Fifield (Jun 13)
- Re: ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time. James Rogers (Jun 13)
- Re: ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time. David Fifield (Jun 13)
- Re: ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time. James Rogers (Jun 13)
- Re: ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time. James Rogers (Jun 25)
- Re: ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time. David Fifield (Jun 25)
- Re: ACK is being sent with a sequence of 0 every time. David Fifield (Jun 13)