Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: pcanywhere-brute request for comments
From: Aleksandar Nikolic <nikolic.alek () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:22:41 +0200
This has been commited as 28981. On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Aleksandar Nikolic <nikolic.alek () gmail com> wrote:
Sorry for the late reply. Apparently my ISP thought I won't be needing Internet connection this weekend...done with the brute.firstonly parameter. Also, what do you mean by "quite some time"? If you detect this behavior (pcAnywhere implementation) and if this value is always the same between versions, then your code could just sleep() for this duration? Or is there a need for an active sleep(<short time>) and retry cycle?In my tests, it the time needed to wait wasn't constant. So this wait-and-retry cycle seemed like a best option. I'll do some cosmetic fixes and, if there are no objections, will commit the script later today. Aleksandar
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- pcanywhere-brute request for comments Aleksandar Nikolic (Jun 15)
- Re: pcanywhere-brute request for comments Hani Benhabiles (Jun 15)
- Re: pcanywhere-brute request for comments Henri Doreau (Jun 16)
- Re: pcanywhere-brute request for comments Aleksandar Nikolic (Jun 18)
- Re: pcanywhere-brute request for comments Aleksandar Nikolic (Jun 18)
- Re: pcanywhere-brute request for comments Aleksandar Nikolic (Jun 18)