Nmap Development mailing list archives
feature request/discussion (--expected-ports)
From: Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <buanzo () buanzo com ar>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:46:16 -0300
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi team, I've been using nmap to monitor port differences in hosts for years. Always parsing the output and diffing. But I was thinking, maybe a --expected-ports argument could be added, then nmap would warn? Maybe this could be a post-scan nse script? example: nmap -sT --top-ports 1000 --expected-ports 80,443 $sometarget nmap --script portdiff --script-args portdiff.expected=80,443 -sT --top-ports 1000 $sometarget I haven't given this much thought, just wondering. What do you think? Have a nice week everybody! - -- ? Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman ? - MUSICA: soundcloud.com/no-carrier Independent Linux and Security Consultant - 16+y of IT exp. at your service . OWASPer - http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html ..: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAlAfvJgACgkQAlpOsGhXcE1fzQCfX1wSMtQmGdcTQFaq04bGeUZO LDkAniuhX9lrmVyjeexNJrnZTidZ4wI8 =AO9B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- feature request/discussion (--expected-ports) Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Aug 06)
- Re: feature request/discussion (--expected-ports) David Fifield (Aug 07)
- Re: feature request/discussion (--expected-ports) Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Aug 07)
- Re: feature request/discussion (--expected-ports) David Fifield (Aug 07)