Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature?
From: John Bond <john.r.bond () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:48:21 +0200
On 13 September 2012 05:24, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:49:49PM -0500, Daniel Miller wrote: http.get(host, port, uri) is the better way to make the request. Maybe we should add a getaddrinfo hint for ai_family=o.af() in l_connect?
Would be nice to help people who make the same mistake i did, I also notice that the patch i sent hasn't been applied. Could you apply it, or let me know if you need to to send another one. Cheers John _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 12)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? John Bond (Sep 13)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 13)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? John Bond (Sep 15)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 15)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? John Bond (Sep 15)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 18)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 13)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? John Bond (Sep 13)