Nmap Development mailing list archives
RE: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug
From: "security-lists" <security-lists () fnci com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:29:53 -0500
Ron, Thanks. Here are the results: 1. nmap -sS -O 192.168.1.0/24 <<< "hung" with no output for a "while" until I CTRL-C'd it. But did not fail with same message. 2. nmap -sS -O 10.250.1.91 <<< worked as expected!!! 3. nmap -sS -O 10.250.1.1-255 <<< worked as expected!!! 4. Non-RFC's works on v4.20 and v6.1. 5. Debugging: C:\Documents and Settings\Me>nmap -vv -dd 10.250.1.0/24 Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-07-08 10:52 Central Daylight Time Fetchfile found C:\Program Files\Nmap/nmap-services PORTS: Using top 1000 ports found open (TCP:1000, UDP:0, SCTP:0) Winpcap present, dynamic linked to: WinPcap version 4.1.2 (packet.dll version 4. 1.0.2001), based on libpcap version 1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008) NPF service is already running. Fetchfile found C:\Program Files\Nmap/nmap.xsl The max # of sockets we are using is: 0 --------------- Timing report --------------- hostgroups: min 1, max 100000 rtt-timeouts: init 1000, min 100, max 10000 max-scan-delay: TCP 1000, UDP 1000, SCTP 1000 parallelism: min 0, max 0 max-retries: 10, host-timeout: 0 min-rate: 0, max-rate: 0 --------------------------------------------- get_srcaddr: can't connect socket: The requested address is not valid in its con text. Failed to convert source address to presentation format!?! Error: Unknown error QUITTING! 6. I overlaid pcap 4.1.2 with same version, no go. Then I stepped-back all the way to pcap v4.0, no go. 7. I removed nmap v6.1 and reinstalled nmap v4.20: C:\Documents and Settings\Me>nmap -sP 10.250.1.0/24 Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2012-07-08 11:08 Central Dayli Time Host 10.250.1.3 appears to be up. MAC Address: REDACTED Host 10.250.1.10 appears to be up. MAC Address: REDACTED Host 10.250.1.16 appears to be up. MAC Address: REDACTED Host 10.250.1.21 appears to be up. MAC Address: REDACTED Host 10.250.1.91 appears to be up. MAC Address: REDACTED Host 10.250.1.92 appears to be up. MAC Address: REDACTED Host 10.250.1.97 appears to be up. Host 10.250.1.98 appears to be up. MAC Address: REDACTED Host 10.250.1.145 appears to be up. MAC Address: REDACTED Host 10.250.1.150 appears to be up. MAC Address: REDACTED Nmap finished: 256 IP addresses (10 hosts up) scanned in 13.047 seconds I don't have handy any previous v6 binaries except v4.20. I'd be happy to test any v5 compiles. But it does seem to be a new issue in later releases from what v4.20 gives me. For now, I'm happy to be able to scan with .1-255 syntax but .... ::Robert -----Original Message----- From: Ron [mailto:ron () skullsecurity net] Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 23:59 To: security-lists Cc: nmap-dev () insecure org Subject: Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug I can't reproduce. Running Win7 Starter and Nmap 6.01: C:\Program Files\Nmap>nmap -sS -O 10.250.1.0/24 Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-07-07 21:57 Pacific Daylight Time Stats: 0:00:33 elapsed; 0 hosts completed (0 up), 256 undergoing Ping Scan Ping Scan Timing: About 14.16% done; ETC: 22:00 (0:03:08 remaining) ... Does this happen with other addresses? Non-RFC1918 addresses? Single hosts (not /24)? /24 if denoted as x.x.x.1-255 instead? Ron On 7/7/2012 8:46 PM, security-lists wrote:
I still find v6,01 has the "this requested address is not valid," bug.
Can
someone verify? Platform: Windows XP Home SP3 C:\Documents and Settings\Me>nmap -sS -O 10.250.1.0/24 Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-07-07 22:20 Central
Daylight
Time get_srcaddr: can't connect socket: The requested address is not valid in
its
con text. Failed to convert source address to presentation format!?! Error: Unknown error QUITTING! ::Robert _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug security-lists (Jul 07)
- Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug Ron (Jul 07)
- RE: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug security-lists (Jul 08)
- Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug David Fifield (Jul 09)
- RE: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug security-lists (Jul 10)
- Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug 'David Fifield' (Sep 12)
- RE: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug security-lists (Jul 10)
- Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug Ron (Jul 07)