Re: Re: Segmentation fault

[Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>]

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com> wrote:

> Topic: Re: Segmentation fault
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:43:30 -0400
> From: Steven Désilets <steven.desilets () gmail com>
> To: Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>
>
> You right sorry , just found it ,
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>
> wrote:
>
> > W dniu 08.10.2014 o 15:06, Steven Désilets pisze:
> > > Hi, we try to test our ids-ips over our office, i try to scan port 80
> > > behind tor with proxychains, and i got this result:
> > >
> > > proxychains nmap  -A  x.x.x.x -p 80
> > > ProxyChains-3.1 (http://proxychains.sf.net)
> > >
> > > Starting Nmap 6.46 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-10-08 08:53 EDT
> > > |S-chain|-<>-127.0.0.1:9050-<><>-X.X.X.X:80-<><>-OK
> > > Segmentation fault
> > >
> > > Anyone have same issue?
> > >
> > > Thank
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent through the dev mailing list
> > > http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> > > Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Are you sure it's not proxychains that caused the segmentation fault?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jacek

Just a suggestion, but you may want to try Proxychains-ng instead. There is
a known problem with Original Proxychains and the way Nmap resolves
addresses: http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2014/q4/54

Dan
_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/