Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 00:32:02 -0800
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:09:24AM +0000, Harshil Lodhi wrote:
1. Should I modify the function prototype, if this happens, the code needs to be changed in a lot of places. 2. A alternate solution I have in my mind is to keep all the function prototypes to be same. We will make changes in a way that transparently replaces linked list. I am not certain how to go about this, but will start my work as soon as I get some time.
You should keep the function prototypes the same. You can do that even if you do not use a linked list. Just change the definition of struct addrset. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation, (continued)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation Harshil Lodhi (Mar 04)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation Harshil Lodhi (Mar 04)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation Harshil Lodhi (Mar 04)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation Daniel Miller (Mar 04)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation sefa saygın (Mar 05)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation Jacek Wielemborek (Mar 05)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation Dave Horsfall (Mar 05)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation Robin Wood (Mar 05)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation David Fifield (Mar 04)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation Harshil Lodhi (Mar 05)
- Re: [GSOC] Nmap exclude list implementation David Fifield (Mar 05)