Nmap Development mailing list archives
[nmap-svn] r36083 - nmap
From: Tudor-Emil COMAN <tudor_emil.coman () cti pub ro>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:57:27 +0000
Hi d33tah, I noticed that scanning the same IP space with -PS80 would yield far less hosts that doing a -Pn -Ss -p 80 and checking for opened and closed ports. Investigating what could be the cause I noticed that get_ping_pcap_result() in scan_engine_raw.cc would always return 0. Always returning 0 would make us receive only one packet per ultra_scan loop and I presume they were being received so slow that the probes would eventually time out. Changing the last line in that function from: return 0; to return goodone; Seems to have solved the problem. Cheers, Tudor ________________________________ From: dev <dev-bounces () nmap org> on behalf of Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com> Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 6:29:01 PM To: dev () nmap org Subject: Re: [nmap-svn] r36083 - nmap W dniu 07.08.2016 o 16:56, commit-mailer () nmap org pisze:
Author: tudor Date: Sun Aug 7 07:56:46 2016 New Revision: 36083 Log: Simple fix that improves accuracy a lot during the host discovery phase
Hi tudor, Could you comment a bit more on how this helps? Cheers, d33tah
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: [nmap-svn] r36083 - nmap Jacek Wielemborek (Aug 07)
- Message not available
- [nmap-svn] r36083 - nmap Tudor-Emil COMAN (Aug 08)
- Message not available