Nmap Development mailing list archives
Fwd: Re: Reg: Protocol divisioning in the tcp packets
From: Akash Das <akash210197 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:30:48 +0530
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Date: Jan 11, 2017 12:29 PM Subject: Re: Reg: Protocol divisioning in the tcp packets To: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com> Cc: Hello Dan, Thanks for the reply, By protocols I meant ipv6 and ipv4 only. I had a doubt that in the IP layer the datagram has a slot of 1 byte address for defining the upper layer protocol that is used. At present nmap has a way of defining what to use tcp,udp or e.t.c. I was thinking that instead of specifying this can we have a random selection of the protocol to use which is best for the network architecture. Thanks, With regards, Akash Das On Jan 11, 2017 2:14 AM, "Daniel Miller" <bonsaiviking () gmail com> wrote: Akash, What do you mean by the "protocol version"? IP protocol version is either IPv4 (default) or IPv6 (with -6 option). TCP does not have versions. Dan On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Akash Das <akash210197 () gmail com> wrote:
In nmap when we do a tcp scan there are many other options provided such as random checksum, random data, e.t.c but there is no option that is being specified for selecting the protocol version to use. I think it might be helpful in bypassing firewall and faster scan. -- *Akash Das* *Student Systems admin* *Indian Institute Of Information Technology* *Sricity* _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Reg: Protocol divisioning in the tcp packets Akash Das (Jan 09)
- Re: Reg: Protocol divisioning in the tcp packets Daniel Miller (Jan 10)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Fwd: Re: Reg: Protocol divisioning in the tcp packets Akash Das (Jan 10)
- Re: Fwd: Re: Reg: Protocol divisioning in the tcp packets Dario Ciccarone (Jan 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Reg: Protocol divisioning in the tcp packets Daniel Miller (Jan 10)