oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley () linus mitre org>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:20:15 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Tomas Hoger wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:45:46 -0400 (EDT) "Steven M. Christey" <coley () linus mitre org> wrote:Use CVE-2009-3051 for both of these format strings, to be filled in later.Looks like this actually got split to two after all... CVE-2009-3051:
Sorry for forgetting to tell everyone about this. One of our CVE analysts did some deeper investigation and noticed that there was a clear break in affected versions, so we decided that a split was reasonable. This distinction wasn't immediately obvious to me when processing the initial ID request. - Steve
Current thread:
- CVE id request: silc-toolkit Nico Golde (Aug 31)
- Message not available
- Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit Tomas Hoger (Sep 11)
- Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit Steven M. Christey (Sep 11)
- Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit Tomas Hoger (Sep 11)
- Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit Tomas Hoger (Sep 11)
- Message not available