oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: [Dailydave] [oss-security] Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable
From: Todd Sabin <tsabin () optonline net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:04:38 -0400
spender () grsecurity net (Brad Spengler) writes:
(Really there should have been a CVE for the lack of -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks instead of pretending the only problem was /dev/net/tun....
Just as a side note, it seems like gcc is missing an option, to me. Okay, it can figure out that some NULL pointer checks seem to be useless, and either optimize them away or leave them in. What about issuing a warning? Where's -Wuseless-null-pointer-check? Todd -- Todd Sabin <tsabin () optonline net>
Current thread:
- Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable yersinia (Jul 17)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Marcus Meissner (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Marcus Meissner (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Marcus Meissner (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Julien Tinnes (Jul 20)
- Re: [Dailydave] [oss-security] Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Todd Sabin (Jul 22)
- Re: Re: [Dailydave] [oss-security] Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable yersinia (Jul 22)