oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: CVE request: irssi 0.8.15


From: Josh Bressers <bressers () redhat com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:23:35 -0400 (EDT)


----- "Steven M. Christey" <coley () linus mitre org> wrote:

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Josh Bressers wrote:

"This release fixes two security issues: The first being that Irssi
didn't check hostname on SSL connections and the other being a hard to
exploit remote crash bug."


The crash bits mentioned in the changelog are very ambiguous. The git
tree isn't any more clear than that. There appear to be two crashes,
both sound like NULL pointer dereferences that cannot be triggered by
an attacker. If I'm wrong, please speak up.

Josh, I think we should assign another CVE anyway.  The upstream vendor
has explicitly labeled this as a security issue, so even if it seems of
limited severity, that's enough to trigger creation of a CVE.  The use of
the "remote crash" term also reinforces the need for a CVE.

This might be juse a plain old crasher from the perspective of many
downstream vendors, but it's still worthy of inclusion in CVE because
there is a significant population that would treat it as a "security"
problem even if it's low severity.

Should I assign one or should you?


Your reasoning makes sense, I'm happy to assign an ID. Thanks.

CVE-2010-1156 irssi 0.8.15 remote DoS

-- 
    JB


Current thread: