oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:57:19 -0700
On 12/04/2011 12:07 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
Am Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:24:19 -0700 schrieb Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>:My mistake, this should have been merged into CVE-2011-4090, it's the same vuln type (XSS) and the same version of Serendipity, CVE-2011-4365 is a bad assignment and should be marked as a duplicate of CVE-2011-4090.I'd disagree on that. CVE-2011-4090 is in an (optional) plugin, while CVE-2011-4365 is an issue in the main s9y code. Although the plugin is shipped with the core s9y, the impact is quite different. For 4090, you only need to care if you do something with the karma-plugin.
Correct me if I'm wrong though but in the plugin advisory it says the fix is to upgrade serendipity to 1.6? If so then it looks like the problem is more back end than plugin. -- -Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team
Current thread:
- CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability Henri Salo (Dec 01)
- Re: CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability Henri Salo (Dec 01)
- Re: CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability Kurt Seifried (Dec 01)
- Re: CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability Kurt Seifried (Dec 01)
- Re: CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability Hanno Böck (Dec 04)
- Re: CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability Kurt Seifried (Dec 04)
- Re: CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability Kurt Seifried (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability Secunia Research (Dec 01)