oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT


From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:57:04 -0600

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/08/2013 11:00 AM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
On 04/08/2013 03:47 AM, Damien Regad wrote:
Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...> writes:
Please use CVE-2013-1930 for this issue.

Hi Kurt,

Thanks for assigning the 3 CVE's.

4. XSS issue on Configuration Report page when displaying 
complex value

This issue affects Mantis 1.2.0rc1 and later.

Lack of proper string escaping allows users (having admin 
access) to enter arbitrary javascript code and have it
executed on the user's browser.

Reference: http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=15416

Does this count as a proper release or does it fall into the 
"beta" classification?

1.2.0rc1 was a beta release. The first "proper" release affected
by this was 1.2.0

Ok not assigning a CVE then, unless there are a large number of
users betas don't get CVEs.

Steve just pointed out I may have misread this. Is 1.2.0 vulnerable,
and this is fixed in 1.2.1, or was it fixed in the 1.2.0 release (so
ONLY 1.2.0-rc1 was affected)?


Hope this clarifies, let me know if you need more info.

Damien






- -- 
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
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=gziP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: