Re: CVE request: pyxtrlock

[Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/15/2013 07:14 AM, Leon Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25.09.2013 21:28:46, Leon Weber wrote:
> > two security issues were found and fixed in pyxtrlock[1], a
> > lightweight X screen locker.
>
> Do you think this isn't CVE worthy, or was the request just lost
> between other work? :-)
>
> -- Leon.

Sorry, meant to reply, forgot. This was the one where I was wondering
how many people us it. Debian doesn't ship it, nor does Red Hat,
Fedora. When I searched it in Google it tries to correct me to
"xtrlock", and for the term I get 644 results, so I'm thinking this
falls into the "not enough people use it to make a CVE worthwhile"
category, is that correct, or is there a large user pool/other factors
 I'm unaware of?

- -- 
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=LBVC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----